Last week there was a meeting at Teatro Dal Verme in Milan, was or was intended as a meeting place for those who believe in Silvio Berlusconi's no ifs, ands or buts, without even wanting to hear, listen and then subsequently to believe everything that is happening in the real world, everything they are talking about newspapers and websites, all I occasionally mention the self-styled newspaper or the news just to give reactions and opinions without ever having given the news, the meeting was transformed into a happening with people in the audience knew and did not know, harangued by people on stage and said he did not say (knowing everything but ...).
To organize all this is Giuliano Ferrara, a few weeks back in full swing in the blind defense of the sword and presdelCons, Ferrara had been good lately, and sneak to weigh and assess what was going on, now finally has decided to stand and do what he likes most: the capopopolo and obviously he does so in a way they like, without prisoners, cutting and wrapping it all with the hatchet to be far from where people follow. So the happening of the Dal Verme has become one of his shows where he has decided not to comment on the facts as they are, emerge, appear, you decide how to define them, but to lash out at those who made them said, has given an opinion, took a position and the starting point for him was the best manifestation of PalaSharp the previous week, one in which many people have expressed their doubts about what's going on, not him, he decided to express doubts about those people who have taken a position.
The harangues of Ferrara almost always have the same pattern, the whining child, the campaigns-campaigns against all, because of, yes, because it is so, because I say so, packed with what all the commentators (of any deployment, who knows why) recognize as a great intelligence and a deep culture, starting from these premises to the proper giulianone did not seem real even to be able to skip Saviano, who, just PalaSharp had left a deep mark with a speech that has many people excited and empowered, to jump directly to head down against Umberto Eco, for him, so that an intellectual challenge to its height.
What then picks up more than anything is giulianone percula (it says so in blogghetti jocks and those who I am not wanting to come right in the group ...) the enemy of the moment, then started with a tirade of his percula, in fact, Shakespeare and his reading Kant instead to give feasts. Telling his audience that oh, yes ma'am, he read Kant, but not the comic book and he who reads and understands it, not like Echo, who will read it too, but who knows what we understand, on the other hand Eco know, also read the comics, in fact he who reads Kant found this very thing here, that "The supreme leader has to be right for himself and yet be a man. From a crooked wood as that which man is made out of nothing can not entirely right, "and then then it's good for a prime minister to fill the house of underage prostitutes, not to worry about national security by anyone entering the house Who would believe the claims to be the grandson of a dictator (and with it some intelligence and his bodyguards. ...), does well to call the police station to make a minor undocumented exploiting his position as president of the Council is good, indeed, must, of course, because it must be a man and man is made of crooked timber.
the giulianone But what has not told his anxious audience is like that sentence ends, Kant now I certainly do not know by heart (even though I know they were all convinced), but the story intrigued me a bit ' , so I went looking and found out that the sentence does not end there, the sentence in full reads, "The supreme leader has to be right for himself and yet be a man. this problem is therefore the most difficult of all and a perfect solution it is impossible from a crooked wood as man is what is done can not leave anything completely right. Only the nearest to this idea is imposed on us by nature. "So the point is a little bit different, the head, as I understand it, eh, then maybe giulianone me explain it better, by nature, must strive to be better, certainly not to be worse and even more wrong, so is the wood that is like that ....
Now, I have no doubt that Kant understands Ferrara and understand what is written in those lines, then the problem becomes much bigger, too big of Ferrara (oh, come on, sooner or later a stop on the tonnage had to do, I'm taking up there ...), the problem here is the bad faith, Ferrara can not be (although overrated) so stupid, then the only point is that he knows to have an audience of readers, who can make fun of, you know they do not know, you do not informed, not reason, who resigned to a political class information and the ability to reason and to choose for them, then he, in very good yes, he knows he can tell them a sea of \u200b\u200bballs for the sole purpose of arming them and let them fight his campaign. Of course, a weapon of them all, of blank cartridges, empty of bla bla and even wrong, but they do not care, this is just what another for comfort, the fact is that if you do not want to be like Indiana Jones and pull out a gun while the other spins the whip, even stay there to hear a blow all its blank cartridges, well, it's a beautiful pain in the ass.
0 comments:
Post a Comment